Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black | Prism bricks black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 409 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a general score of 92.9, which is better than the Galaxy XCover Pro's global score of 81. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is a lighter and thinner cellphone than the Galaxy XCover Pro, although both of them were only released 6 months apart. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has the previous 10 version and Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11 version.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features a little better processing power than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro and Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW count with incredibly similar displays, because although the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a little bit inferior pixel quantity per inch in the screen, it also counts with a little higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a quite bigger display.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW captures greater photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low-light photos, it also counts with a way better (4K) video definition, a way bigger camera sensor and a camera in the back with a way higher 64 mega pixels resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features a much better storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has an external memory card slot that admits up to 1000 GB and more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy A71 5G UW features just a little better battery duration than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is way more expensive than Galaxy XCover Pro, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.