Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-31 | 2018-11-15 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A9 (2018) has a global score of 85.2, which is just a bit better than Galaxy XCover Pro's 81 overall score. Galaxy A9 (2018) is an older phone than the Galaxy XCover Pro, but Samsung made it way thinner and somewhat lighter anyway. The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with just a bit better looking display than Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have a display with the same size, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has a slightly better 1080 x 2340px resolution and a bit better pixels amount in each inch of screen.
Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with a processor that's just as good as Galaxy XCover Pro's processor, and although the Galaxy A9 (2018) has more RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a less megapixels resolution back facing camera, and they both have a F1.7 aperture, the Galaxy A9 (2018) also counts with a lot better (4K) video definition and a lot bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with a much better memory to install games and applications than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a SD memory slot that holds up to 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) also has 128 GB internal memory. Galaxy XCover Pro features a little longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a 4050mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.