Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-01-31 | 2016-06-01 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.17 x 3.04 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black | Gold, Gray and Pink |
| -- | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover Pro has a general score of 81, which is slightly better than the Galaxy C7's general score of 77.7. Both phones we compare here have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy XCover Pro has the previous 11 version while Galaxy C7 has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Galaxy XCover Pro is a extremely newer phone than Galaxy C7, although it's thicker and heavier.
The Galaxy XCover Pro has a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy C7. They have a Octa-Core CPU and a 4 GB RAM. Galaxy XCover Pro features a slightly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy C7, because it has a just a little better pixel quantity per display inch, a bit bigger screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels.
Galaxy XCover Pro captures a little bit better videos and photos than Galaxy C7, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video definition, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has a back-facing camera with a way better 25 megapixels resolution and a larger camera aperture to capture better photography in low-light situations.
Galaxy XCover Pro features a greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy C7, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has an external memory card slot that holds up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features improved battery performance than Samsung Galaxy C7, because it has a 23% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.