Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 7.0 Nougat |
| 2020-01-31 | 2017-06-20 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.17 x 3.10 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | MediaTek Helio P20 MT6757 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 16 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-T880 MP2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro is just a bit better than the Galaxy J7 Max, getting an 81 score against 76.1. Although Galaxy XCover Pro is a lot newer than Galaxy J7 Max, it is heavier and somewhat thicker. Both phones in this review include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy XCover Pro has older 11 version while Galaxy J7 Max has Android 7.0 Nougat.
Galaxy XCover Pro has a little bit better screen than Galaxy J7 Max, because it has a quite bigger screen, a bit more pixels per inch of screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340px. The Galaxy J7 Max and Galaxy XCover Pro have similar processors, they have the same RAM amount and 8 cpu cores.
Galaxy XCover Pro captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 Max, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate, the same aperture and the same video quality, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has a way higher resolution back facing camera. The Galaxy XCover Pro has a much better memory for apps and games than Galaxy J7 Max, because it has 32 GB more internal storage capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with better battery performance than Galaxy J7 Max, because it has a 23% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.