Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-01-31 | 2018-06-28 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue, Gold and Pink |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 274 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy J8, getting an 81 score against 76.7. Both phones we compare here come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has the newer 11 version while Samsung Galaxy J8 has Android 10, so it counts with lots of additional features. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a newer cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy J8, although it's heavier and somewhat thicker.
Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a much better screen than Galaxy J8, because it has a greater number of pixels per inch in the display, a bit bigger screen and a much better 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution. Galaxy XCover Pro features a bit more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy J8, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has an external memory card slot that allows up to 512 GB.
The Galaxy XCover Pro features a little bit better performance than Galaxy J8. Both have the same RAM amount and 8 processing cores. Galaxy XCover Pro features a slightly better camera than Galaxy J8, because although it has a way smaller sensor shooting lot worse quality videos and pictures, and they both have the same diafragm aperture, the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video definition, the Galaxy XCover Pro also counts with a camera with lot more mega pixels.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with better battery life than Galaxy J8, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.