Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-01-31 | 2019-03-07 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black | Black and Blue |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 394 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M30 is a little bit better than Galaxy XCover Pro, getting an 82.4 score against 81. Samsung Galaxy M30's design is somewhat thinner and much lighter than the Galaxy XCover Pro, although it was released just 11 months before. Both phones in our current comparison have Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy M30 has the newer 9.0 Pie version and Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11 version.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy M30, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a little better pixel density. Samsung Galaxy M30 counts with a much greater storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have an external SD slot that admits up to 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy M30 also has 64 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy M30, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro captures clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy M30, because although it has a much tinier back-facing camera sensor shooting lot lower quality pictures, and they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also counts with a larger camera aperture to take better images and videos in low-light environments and a much better resolution back camera.
Galaxy M30 counts with greater battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 23% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.