Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Black | Black and White |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 409 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M51 has a general score of 87.7, which is a little bit better than Galaxy XCover Pro's score of 81. Both of these devices come with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy M51 has 10 version and Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11 version. The Samsung Galaxy M51 is a just a little lighter and just a little bit thinner cellphone than Galaxy XCover Pro, even when both of them were released only 7 months apart.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2340px resolution, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also counts with a little higher number of pixels in each display inch. Galaxy M51 features a processor that is very similar to the processing unit in Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although the Galaxy M51 has a larger amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Samsung Galaxy M51 shoots way better videos and photos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a much bigger sensor, a lot higher video quality and a back-facing camera with much more mega pixels. Galaxy M51 has a much greater memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have an external memory slot that admits up to 512 GB, the Galaxy M51 also has 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy M51 features a much longer battery life than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 73% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.