Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a global score of 98.9, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro's score of 81. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a a little lighter and somewhat thinner phone than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, although both of them were released with only a couple of months difference. Both devices we compare here have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has newer 13 version while Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a slightly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a little larger screen, a better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels and a just a little higher quantity of pixels in each inch in the screen. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a little better hardware performance than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra captures a lot better pictures and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light images and video, it also counts with a camera with lot more mega pixels, a much better 7680x4320 video resolution and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor which provides a way better image and video quality.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is way more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.