Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| -- | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro has a score of 81, which is slightly better than the Galaxy Note 5's score of 79.3. These devices have Android OS, but Galaxy XCover Pro has 11 version and Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1. The Galaxy XCover Pro construction is extremely newer than the Galaxy Note 5's, although it's noticeably heavier and a lot thicker.
The Galaxy XCover Pro features a bit better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has a higher number of faster cores. The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 counts with a sharper display than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the display and a better 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution.
Galaxy Note 5 captures clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low-light images and a back-facing camera with a way lower resolution, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a lot bigger sensor.
Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a much greater storage to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 512 GB. The Galaxy XCover Pro features a much longer battery performance than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 35 percent greater battery size.
Galaxy XCover Pro is a little more expensive than the Galaxy Note 5, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.