Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-31 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a global score of 81, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition's 80.4 overall score. Even though Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is notably newer than the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, it's a lot heavier and thicker. Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a little sharper screen than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a higher display pixel density.
Galaxy Note Fan Edition's CPU is just as good as Galaxy XCover Pro's processing unit, they have 8 cpu cores and 4 GB of RAM. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a bit bigger storage to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 512 GB.
The Galaxy XCover Pro features better battery duration than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 27% more battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro takes a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a lot smaller sensor taking lot lower quality videos and photographs, and they both have the same aperture, the same 1920x1080 video definition and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also counts with a lot better 25 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Galaxy XCover Pro is also a lot cheaper, which makes this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.