Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black | Black, Pink and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro has a global score of 81, which is a bit better than Galaxy Note3's 77.7 general score. Galaxy XCover Pro is a notably newer device than Galaxy Note3, but it is somewhat thicker and notably heavier. Both of these phones use Android OS, but Galaxy XCover Pro has older 11 version and Galaxy Note3 has Android 4.4.2.
Galaxy XCover Pro has a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a quite bigger display, a just a little more pixels per inch in the screen and a bit higher 1080 x 2340 resolution. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a bit superior CPU than Galaxy Note3, because it has a greater number of cores and 1 GB more RAM memory.
The Galaxy XCover Pro features a very superior memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note3, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro shoots slightly better videos and photos than Galaxy Note3, because although it has a way smaller sensor shooting much worse quality videos and pictures, and they both have the same (Full HD) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also counts with a much higher 25 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera and a much larger aperture to take better low light photos.
Galaxy XCover Pro has better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a 4050mAh battery size instead of 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.