Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-31 | 2016-08-02 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note7, getting a global score of 81 against 79.5. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a a lot newer phone than Samsung Galaxy Note7, although it is incredibly thicker and incredibly heavier. Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy Note7, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has a larger number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy Note7 has a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560. Galaxy XCover Pro features a bit more memory for games and applications than Galaxy Note7, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy XCover Pro shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a way tinier back-facing camera sensor taking way worse quality videos and pictures, and they both have the same (Full HD) video definition, a F1.7 aperture and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy XCover Pro also counts with a back facing camera with a much higher resolution.
The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with superior battery performance than Galaxy Note7, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.