Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 7.1 Nougat |
| 2020-01-31 | 2018-01-09 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 409 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.82 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover Pro is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime, getting an 81 score against 76.9. The Galaxy XCover Pro design is way newer than Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime's, but it is noticeably thicker and notably heavier. Both phones we compare here use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy XCover Pro has the older 11 version and Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a bit sharper display than Galaxy On7 Prime, because it has a little bigger display, a just a bit higher quantity of pixels in each inch of display and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340. Galaxy XCover Pro features a little faster CPU than Galaxy On7 Prime. They have the same number of cores and a 4 GB RAM.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro shoots clearer photos and videos than Galaxy On7 Prime, because although it has a much tinier camera sensor shooting lot lower quality videos and pictures, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also counts with a bigger camera aperture to capture better captures and video in low-light environments and a way more mega-pixels camera in the back.
Galaxy XCover Pro has a little bit better storage to install games and applications than Galaxy On7 Prime, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy XCover Pro has longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.