Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-01-31 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is better than the Galaxy XCover Pro, getting a global score of 93.6 against 81. These phones have the same Android 11 OS (operating system). Even when Samsung Galaxy S10 5G and the Galaxy XCover Pro were only released with a couple months difference, Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is somewhat lighter and thinner.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has just a bit better looking display than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a little bit more pixels per inch in the screen, a bit larger screen and a higher 1440 x 3040 resolution. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy S10 5G counts with a quite bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features a little better battery duration than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has an 11 percent more battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a much less mega pixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a much better (4K) video resolution, a much larger sensor and a larger aperture.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Galaxy S10 5G is also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.