Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-31 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 421.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 409 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a score of 89.7, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro's 81 score. Even though Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite and the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro were released with only a couple months difference, Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is lighter and thinner. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a bit better performance than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also has 4 GB more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite and Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro feature very similar displays, because although the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a little bit less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bit bigger screen. Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a much better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
Galaxy S10 Lite features just a little bit longer battery duration than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has an 11% greater battery capacity. Galaxy S10 Lite shoots much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low-light photography, it also counts with a back camera with much more mega-pixels, a way larger back-facing camera sensor and a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Galaxy S10 Lite not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.