Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-31 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Black | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10e has a global score of 86.3, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro's 81 general score. The Galaxy S10e construction is much thinner and noticeably lighter than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, even though it was released just 11 months before. The Galaxy S10e counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels, it also counts with a just a little better screen density.
The Galaxy S10e counts with a little better performance than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy S10e also has a higher amount of RAM. Galaxy S10e has much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB, the Galaxy S10e also has 128 GB internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy S10e captures clearer videos and photos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a much lower 12 MP resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a larger camera aperture, a much bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a much higher image and video quality and a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with greater battery life than Galaxy S10e, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity instead of 3100mAh.
Even being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the Galaxy S10e is also cheaper, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.