Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Black | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 is much better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, having a general score of 94.8 against 81. These devices have Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S20 has the newer 13 version and Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11 version, providing a lot of extra features and improved performance. Samsung Galaxy S20's construction is lighter and notably thinner than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, even when they were released with only 1 months difference.
The Galaxy S20 features a bit better performance than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy S20 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S20 has just a bit better screen than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 and a higher pixels number in each screen inch.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 features a better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low light images and video and a way less mega pixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a much bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a way better 7680x4320 video resolution.
The Galaxy S20 features a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1000 GB and more internal memory capacity. Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S20, because it has a 1 percent larger battery capacity.
Galaxy S20 costs a lot more money than Galaxy XCover Pro, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.