Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 FE is better than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, with a 90.8 score against 81. Galaxy S20 FE is a somewhat thinner and lighter device than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, even when both were released only 8 months apart. Both phones in this review come with the same Android 11 OS, so both should provide the user identical OS features.
The Galaxy S20 FE counts with a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy S20 FE also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a slightly better screen than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a little bit lower pixels density, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a quite larger screen.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a superior storage for games and applications than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has more internal storage and an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy S20 FE has just a bit better battery life than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 4050mAh.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a camera with a much worse 12 mega pixels resolution and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for shooting photos in low-light environments, it also counts with a way bigger camera sensor providing a way higher image quality and a way higher video definition.
Galaxy S20 FE is more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.