Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 89.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2022-01-11 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.13 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black | -- |
| -- | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S21 FE is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, getting an 89.1 score against 81. The Galaxy S21 FE is a newer phone, and it is also incredibly lighter and extremely thinner than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro. Both of these devices work with the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't see any difference in that aspect.
The Galaxy S21 FE has a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy S21 FE also has more RAM. Galaxy S21 FE has a bit sharper display than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a just a little less pixels per screen inch, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2340px resolution, the Galaxy S21 FE also counts with a little bit larger screen.
The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a quite bigger storage for applications and games than Galaxy S21 FE, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy S21 FE features a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 4050mAh.
The Galaxy S21 FE counts with just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a much less megapixels resolution back-facing camera and a tinier aperture which is not recommended for capturing photographs or videos in low light environments, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 video resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy S21 FE is a lot more expensive than the Galaxy XCover Pro, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.