Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 is better than Galaxy XCover Pro, having a general score of 93.4 against 81. Both devices in this comparison review come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S22 has the newer 13 version and Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11. Galaxy S22's design is newer, lighter and a lot thinner than Galaxy XCover Pro.
The Galaxy S22 has a much better screen than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, the Galaxy S22 also counts with a bit better pixel quantity in each inch of screen. Samsung Galaxy S22 features a bit better performance than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy XCover Pro features a greater memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S22, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits up to 512 GB. The Galaxy XCover Pro has a bit superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S22, because it has a 4050mAh battery capacity.
The Galaxy S22 counts with a very superior camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low-light captures, it also counts with a way better 7680x4320 video quality, a much more mega-pixels back facing camera and a lot bigger sensor.
The Galaxy S22 is way more expensive than Galaxy XCover Pro, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.