Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-01-31 | -- |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | -- |
| 7.76 ounces | -- |
| Black | -- |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 is slightly better than the Galaxy XCover Pro, with an 82.6 score against 81. Galaxy S25 is a notably lighter and notably thinner phone than the Galaxy XCover Pro. These devices use Android OS, but the Galaxy S25 has newer 14 version and Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11 version, offering a couple nice extra features and optimized performance.
Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a much better performance than Galaxy S25, although it has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Galaxy S25 features a more vivid display than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have the same 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Galaxy S25 also counts with a bit greater pixel count in each screen inch.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 takes much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light images, it also counts with a way bigger back-facing camera sensor which provides a much better image and video quality, a back-facing camera with much more mega pixels and a lot better 7680x4320 video definition.
Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a better memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S25, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a bit superior battery life than Galaxy S25, because it has a 4050mAh battery capacity.
Although Galaxy S25 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Galaxy XCover Pro, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy XCover Pro. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Galaxy S25, else you can save some dollars and buy the Galaxy XCover Pro, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.