Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-01-31 | -- |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | -- |
| 7.76 ounces | -- |
| Black | -- |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a score of 90.7, which is better than the Galaxy XCover Pro's 81 overall score. The Galaxy S25 Ultra design is incredibly lighter and a lot thinner than Galaxy XCover Pro. These devices use Android OS, but Galaxy S25 Ultra has newer 14 version while Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11, so it gives a couple nice extra features and increased performance.
Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a very superior processor than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a way better display than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a quite larger display, a higher 1440 x 3088px resolution and a little greater quantity of pixels in each screen inch.
Galaxy S25 Ultra has a greater storage for applications and games than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity. Galaxy S25 Ultra has improved battery duration than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 23 percent bigger battery size.
Galaxy S25 Ultra shoots way better photos and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a camera with way more megapixels, a lot better video resolution and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.