Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 5.0 |
| 2020-01-31 | -- |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | -- |
| Black | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover Pro has a global score of 81, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active's 80.9 general score. Both of these phones include Android OS, but the Galaxy XCover Pro has a newer 11 version and Samsung Galaxy S6 Active has Android 5.0 version, providing some additional features and improved performance.
Samsung Galaxy S6 Active features a bit superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active also counts with a 64-bit processing unit and an additional graphics co-processor.
The Galaxy S6 Active counts with a lot better screen than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixels number in each screen inch and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro shoots much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has a lot tinier sensor, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also counts with a lot higher resolution camera in the back and a larger diafragm aperture for better low light images.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a much bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has 64 GB internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with improved battery life than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Galaxy S6 Active, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy S6 Active. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy the Galaxy S6 Active, letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.