Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-31 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Black | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover Pro has an overall score of 81, which is a little bit better than Galaxy S7's global score of 79.5. Galaxy XCover Pro's design is much newer, but much thicker and way heavier than Galaxy S7. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a bit faster CPU than Galaxy S7, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also has a higher number of cores.
Galaxy S7 has a brighter display than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per display inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a much better storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S7, because it has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB and 64 GB internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy S7's camera is very similar to the camera in Galaxy XCover Pro, because although the Samsung Galaxy S7 has a much lower 12 mega-pixels resolution camera, and they both have a same size aperture, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a much larger sensor taking lot higher quality videos and pictures.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a way better battery performance than Galaxy S7, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy XCover Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Samsung Galaxy S7, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Samsung Galaxy S7. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Galaxy XCover Pro, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Samsung Galaxy S7, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.