Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-31 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, having a score of 81 against 75.8. The Galaxy XCover Pro construction has the same thickness than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, but it is somewhat heavier. The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a bit better processing unit than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has a larger number of faster cores.
The Galaxy S7 Active counts with a more vivid display than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a greater pixels density. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same video definition, a same size aperture and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also has a back camera with a lot better 25 mega-pixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a superior storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 512 GB and 32 GB more internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features just a little bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. If you prefer to save some money, you can get Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, letting go a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.