Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Black | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 3 is better than the Galaxy XCover Pro, with a global score of 90.6 against 81. Both of these devices include the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so they should provide all the same operating system features. Even though Galaxy Z Fold 3 is heavier than Galaxy XCover Pro, it's a lot thinner and newer.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has more RAM. The Galaxy XCover Pro features a little bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a way lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite higher pixels density.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a way better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a lot better 25 mega-pixels resolution camera and a much larger aperture to take better images and videos in low-light environments. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a bit better battery duration than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 4400mAh battery size against 4050mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.