Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-01-31 | -- |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 8.32 ounces |
| Black | Black Shadow |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 421.00 | $ 2020.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2184 x 1968 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is better than the Galaxy XCover Pro, getting a global score of 91.1 against 81. The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a a little bit heavier but incredibly thinner cellphone than the Galaxy XCover Pro. Both phones in this comparison include Android OS, but the Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has the newer 14 version and Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11.
Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a little bit lower pixel amount per display inch, it also counts with a bigger display and a higher resolution of 1968 x 2184 pixels. Galaxy XCover Pro has a lot better hardware performance than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition shoots much better photos and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for shooting photos or videos in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a much more megapixels camera. Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has just a bit better battery performance than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity against 4050mAh.
Although Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro. If you want to save some money, you can get Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, letting go a couple features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.