Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-31 | 2017-04-05 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.68 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue and Silver |
| -- | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover Pro is just a bit better than the Xperia XZs, having a general score of 81 against 77.2. Although the Galaxy XCover Pro is incredibly newer than Xperia XZs, it is extremely heavier and thicker. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a little faster CPU than Sony Xperia XZs, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also has a higher number of cores.
Sony Xperia XZs features a display that's very similar to the screen in Galaxy XCover Pro, because although the Sony Xperia XZs has a little worse 1080 x 1920px resolution and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a quite higher number of pixels per inch of screen. The Galaxy XCover Pro has much more memory capacity for apps and games than Xperia XZs, because it has 32 GB more internal storage capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a much better battery performance than Xperia XZs, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity instead of 2900mAh. The Sony Xperia XZs takes a lot better photos and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture and a camera with a lot worse 19 mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a way larger back camera sensor taking lot higher quality photos and a lot better 3840x2160 video quality.
In addition to being the best phone in our current comparison, the Galaxy XCover Pro is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.