Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2021-04-20 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.46 x 2.87 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black | Marine Blue and Moondust Gray |
| -- | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover Pro is just a bit better than the TCL 20 Pro 5G, getting a overall score of 81 against 76.1. Both phones we compare here work with the same Android 11 OS (operating system). Even being the best cellphone we compare here, the Galaxy XCover Pro is an older, somewhat heavier and just a little thicker cellphone than TCL 20 Pro 5G.
The Galaxy XCover Pro has a bit more vivid screen than TCL 20 Pro 5G, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit greater screen density. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than TCL 20 Pro 5G, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The TCL 20 Pro 5G counts with a superior storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1 TB and more internal memory capacity. The TCL 20 Pro 5G counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a way bigger sensor which gives a way better photo and video quality, a much better 3840x2160 video resolution and a back-facing camera with much more megapixels.
TCL 20 Pro 5G features a bit better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.