Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-01-31 | -- |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | -- |
| 7.76 ounces | -- |
| Black | Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 524 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (1920 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4800mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi 12S Ultra is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, having an 81 score against 81. Xiaomi 12S Ultra's construction is noticeably lighter and a lot thinner than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro. Both phones we compare here work with Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi 12S Ultra has 12 version and Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11.
Galaxy XCover Pro has a much powerful processing unit than Xiaomi 12S Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Xiaomi 12S Ultra counts with a sharper display than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a bit bigger screen, a better resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels and more pixels per screen inch.
The Xiaomi 12S Ultra features a greater memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage. Xiaomi 12S Ultra has a much better camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for low-light captures and videos, it also counts with a much better video definition, a much bigger sensor taking lot better quality photos and a camera with a lot better resolution.
The Xiaomi 12S Ultra has greater battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 19 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.