Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2020-05-08 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.64 x 3.04 x 0.41 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black | Armor gray, Lightning black and Star silver |
| -- | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4720mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has an overall score of 86.6, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro's global score of 81. Both of these devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has the older 10 version while Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11 version. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 body is a little bit heavier and a little bit thicker than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has a display that's just as good as the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro one, because although the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has a just a little lower screen density, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a quite bigger display. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 features a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a better memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 takes a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for low light photos, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a way higher resolution camera in the back and a much bigger camera sensor capturing lot higher quality videos and photos.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 counts with just a little bit longer battery life than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 17% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.