Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 90.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2020-05-08 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black | Blasting black |
| -- | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 7.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 484 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has an overall score of 90.1, which is better than the Galaxy XCover Pro's general score of 81. Both phones in this comparison review use Android operating system, but Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has 10 version and Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11 version. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is an a little heavier and a little thicker cellphone than Galaxy XCover Pro.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a little sharper screen than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels, a quite bigger display and a little higher screen pixel density. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro captures way better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for low-light photography, it also counts with a way better (4K) video definition, a lot higher resolution back facing camera and a lot larger back camera sensor.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a better memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.