Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2021-05-06 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.45 x 3.01 x 0.41 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.41 ounces |
| Black | Mirror Black and Pale Grey |
| -- | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 421.00 | $ 499.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 409 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 4 is a little bit better than the Galaxy XCover Pro, with a score of 88.3 against 81. Although Xiaomi Black Shark 4 is a little bit thicker than the Galaxy XCover Pro, it's a little bit lighter and also newer. These phones have the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't see any difference regarding that.
Xiaomi Black Shark 4 counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Xiaomi Black Shark 4 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Xiaomi Black Shark 4 features a more vivid display than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a quite inferior pixel number per inch of display, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit larger display.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark 4, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 512 GB. The Xiaomi Black Shark 4 captures much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for low-light photography, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 video resolution, a way higher resolution camera and a lot larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 4 has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 4050mAh.
Xiaomi Black Shark 4 is more expensive than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.