Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2020-10-01 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.62 ounces |
| Black | Cosmic black and Lunar silver |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 650 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 10T is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, having a overall score of 87.9 against 81. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but the Xiaomi Mi 10T has the previous 10 version while Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11. The Xiaomi Mi 10T is a a little lighter and a little thinner device than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, although they were released only a couple of months apart.
Xiaomi Mi 10T counts with a little bit better display than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a just a bit worse quantity of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a bit bigger display. Xiaomi Mi 10T has a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi 10T also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Xiaomi Mi 10T has a way better camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a much higher video resolution, a lot larger sensor and a camera in the back with much more mega pixels. Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a greater storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 10T, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 512 GB.
The Xiaomi Mi 10T features longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4050mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.