Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 76.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-31 | 2017-04-28 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 5.72 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 421.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2457 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | -- |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 3350mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Mi 6, with a overall score of 81 against 76.5. Even though the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is extremely newer than the Xiaomi Mi 6, it's notably thicker and much heavier. The Xiaomi Mi 6 features a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xiaomi Mi 6 also has a larger amount of RAM.
Xiaomi Mi 6 counts with just a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a little smaller display and a little bit worse 1080 x 1920 resolution, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per screen inch. Galaxy XCover Pro features a greater storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 6, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a slightly better camera than Xiaomi Mi 6, because although it has a way smaller camera sensor taking way lower quality photos, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also counts with a bigger camera aperture for better low light photography and videos and a back camera with way more mega-pixels.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has superior battery duration than Xiaomi Mi 6, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity instead of 3350mAh.
Galaxy XCover Pro costs the same than the Xiaomi Mi 6, making it a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.