Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 83.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-31 | 2019-03-06 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.20 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.10 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue and Purple |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 9 is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, getting a global score of 83.2 against 81. Xiaomi Mi 9's body is way lighter and much thinner than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, although it was released around 11 months before. Xiaomi Mi 9 has just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have 8 cores, the Xiaomi Mi 9 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Mi 9 has a bit more vivid display than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a little lower pixels density, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the Xiaomi Mi 9 also counts with a little larger screen. The Xiaomi Mi 9 captures much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for low light captures and videos, it also counts with a much bigger back camera sensor shooting way higher quality videos and pictures, a way better video quality and a way more MP camera in the back.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a quite bigger memory to install applications and games than Xiaomi Mi 9, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy XCover Pro counts with superior battery duration than Xiaomi Mi 9, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.