Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 81.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-01-31 | 2019-04-15 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 5.81 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Black | 16 777 216 |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 SDM712 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 616 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 3070mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE is a bit better than Galaxy XCover Pro, with a score of 81.4 against 81. Xiaomi Mi 9 SE is an older phone than Galaxy XCover Pro, but it is extremely thinner and extremely lighter anyway. These devices work with Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has a more recent 9.0 Pie version and Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11.
The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE counts with a bit better display than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE also counts with a little bit higher pixels count per screen inch. Galaxy XCover Pro has a better memory capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE also has more RAM memory. Xiaomi Mi 9 SE takes much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for shooting pictures and videos in low-light situations, it also counts with a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a lot better image quality, a lot more megapixels back-facing camera and a lot better (4K) video definition.
Galaxy XCover Pro has greater battery performance than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.