Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-01-31 | 2019-06-17 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Black | Carbon Black, Flame Red and Glacier Blue |
| -- | Metal and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 9T has a score of 82.2, which is a little bit better than Galaxy XCover Pro's 81 general score. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Mi 9T has the previous 10 version while Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11 version. Xiaomi Mi 9T is a lighter and somewhat thinner phone than Galaxy XCover Pro, even though both were only released with a couple of months difference.
Xiaomi Mi 9T has a processing unit that's just as good as Galaxy XCover Pro's processing unit, and although the Xiaomi Mi 9T has 2 GB more RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Xiaomi Mi 9T has a slightly better display than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a little lower amount of pixels per inch in the display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2340, the Xiaomi Mi 9T also counts with a little bit larger display.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T has a much better camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for low light photos and videos, it also counts with a much larger back-facing camera sensor taking much better quality photographs, a lot higher 48 megapixels resolution back facing camera and a much better 3840x2160 video definition.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because it has a 4050mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.