Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-01-31 | 2019-08-20 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Black | Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a score of 82.7, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro's 81 general score. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro's design is lighter and thinner than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, although both were released only 5 months apart. Both phones in our current comparison use Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has 10 version and Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a just a bit worse pixels amount in each inch of screen, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also counts with a little larger display. The Galaxy XCover Pro features a bigger memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 512 GB.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features a bit better CPU than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also has a larger amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features a greater camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a much more MP back-facing camera, a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a much bigger camera sensor.
Galaxy XCover Pro counts with just a bit better battery performance than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.