Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 78 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-31 | 2018-07-27 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.25 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue, Gold, Pink and Red |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 3010mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is slightly better than Xiaomi Mi A2, with a general score of 81 against 78. Although Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is newer than the Xiaomi Mi A2, it is noticeably heavier and extremely thicker. Xiaomi Mi A2 and Galaxy XCover Pro have incredibly similar CPUs, and although the Xiaomi Mi A2 has a larger amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Xiaomi Mi A2 features a display that's very similar to Galaxy XCover Pro's display, although the Xiaomi Mi A2 has a little bit lower pixel amount per inch of display, a little bit worse 1080 x 2160 resolution and a little bit smaller display. The Xiaomi Mi A2 and Galaxy XCover Pro have very similar cameras, because although the Xiaomi Mi A2 has a much less mega pixels resolution camera and a tinier aperture, it also counts with a lot better video resolution and a way bigger camera sensor providing a much better image quality.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi A2, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Galaxy XCover Pro has a superior battery performance than Xiaomi Mi A2, because it has a 4050mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.