Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-01-31 | 2019-07-24 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.04 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.13 ounces |
| Black | Blue, Gray and White |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 282 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 13.18 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4030mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro is slightly better than Xiaomi Mi A3, having a overall score of 81 against 79.2. Although it's the best in this review, the Galaxy XCover Pro design is thicker and heavier than the Xiaomi Mi A3. Both phones we compare here have the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so they should give you very similar OS features.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a much better screen than Xiaomi Mi A3, because it has a quite bigger display, a greater pixels density and a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels. The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi A3. They have a 4 GB RAM and the same number of cores.
Xiaomi Mi A3 has a better camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for shooting photographs or video in low-light situations, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a camera in the back with a lot higher 48 mega pixels resolution and a way larger back-facing camera sensor taking way higher quality videos and photographs.
The Xiaomi Mi A3 counts with more storage for games and applications than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 256 GB against 512 GB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. Galaxy XCover Pro has a little better battery life than Xiaomi Mi A3, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity against 4030mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.