Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 77.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-31 | 2016-05-17 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.81 x 3.48 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Black | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 344 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8956 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 13.18 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4850mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Mi Max, with a score of 81 against 77.5. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro's construction is noticeably newer, but a little bit heavier and thicker than Xiaomi Mi Max. The Galaxy XCover Pro has a little faster processing unit than Xiaomi Mi Max. They have the same number of cores and a 4 GB RAM.
Galaxy XCover Pro has a little bit better screen than Xiaomi Mi Max, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little higher display pixels density and a little higher 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution. The Galaxy XCover Pro takes a bit better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi Max, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has a lot higher 25 MP resolution camera in the back and a larger camera aperture to capture better captures and videos in poorly lited situations.
Xiaomi Mi Max counts with a greater storage for games and applications than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a SD memory slot that holds 256 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Mi Max features improved battery duration than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 4850mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.