Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-31 | 2017-10-10 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 5.98 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black | Black |
| -- | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 614.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi MIX 2 has a score of 81.2, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro's global score of 81. The Xiaomi Mi MIX 2 construction is somewhat lighter and way thinner than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. Xiaomi Mi MIX 2 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Xiaomi Mi MIX 2 also has a higher amount of RAM.
Xiaomi Mi MIX 2 has a display that's just as good as Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro's screen, although the Xiaomi Mi MIX 2 has a little smaller display, a little bit worse display density and a bit lower 1080 x 2160 pixels resolution. The Xiaomi Mi MIX 2 has a quite bigger memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has longer battery duration than Xiaomi Mi MIX 2, because it has a 19 percent bigger battery size. The Galaxy XCover Pro captures a bit better photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi MIX 2, because although it has a way tinier back camera sensor taking lot lower quality videos and photographs, and they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy XCover Pro also counts with a larger aperture for better low-light captures and a much more mega-pixels back camera.
Although Xiaomi Mi MIX 2 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Galaxy XCover Pro, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy XCover Pro. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Xiaomi Mi MIX 2, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the Galaxy XCover Pro, giving up some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.