Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-31 | 2018-04-03 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black | Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 639.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is a bit better than Galaxy XCover Pro, getting an 83.8 score against 81. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is an older cellphone than Galaxy XCover Pro, but it is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter anyway. The Galaxy XCover Pro and the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s count with extremely similar screens, although the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a just a little lower display density, a little worse 1080 x 2160 pixels resolution and a bit smaller display.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s also has more RAM. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s's camera is very similar to the Galaxy XCover Pro one, because although the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a smaller aperture and a much lower 12 mega pixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a much bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting way better quality videos and photos and a way better (4K) video definition.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with a quite bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has improved battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a 19% more battery size.
Although Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.