Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-31 | 2018-11-01 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.22 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue and Green |
| -- | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has a global score of 83.8, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro's 81 score. Although Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 is older than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, it's body is somewhat thinner and just a little lighter. Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 features a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 also has more RAM.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 counts with a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a just a bit worse quantity of pixels per screen inch, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 also counts with a little larger screen. Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has a better storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 features just a bit better camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a much less mega pixels back facing camera and a smaller camera aperture which is not good for low light photos and videos, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 video definition and a lot bigger sensor shooting way higher quality videos and pictures.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features better battery duration than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.