Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-01-31 | 2016-11-01 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.15 x 3.04 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black | Black and Silver |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 421.00 | $ 516.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 8.69 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4070mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover Pro has a global score of 81, which is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Mi Note 2's overall score of 76. Both of these devices have Android operating system, but Galaxy XCover Pro has an older 11 version while Xiaomi Mi Note 2 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow. Galaxy XCover Pro is a incredibly newer device than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, although it is incredibly thicker and notably heavier.
The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a bit better performance than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a larger number of cores. Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a little sharper display than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340, a little bit higher screen density and a little bit bigger display.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro captures better photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because although it has a way tinier sensor shooting lot worse quality videos and pictures, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (Full HD) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also counts with a larger aperture for better photos and video in poorly lited situations and a camera in the back with a higher 25 megapixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Xiaomi Mi Note 2's battery life is very similar to the Galaxy XCover Pro one, although the Xiaomi Mi Note 2 also has a 0 percent greater battery size.
Even being the best phone of the ones we compare here, Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.