Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a general score of 87.9, which is a bit better than the Galaxy XCover Pro's 81 global score. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has older 10 version and Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro's construction is a bit lighter and thinner than the Galaxy XCover Pro, although they were released only a few months apart.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a slightly better looking display than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a quite inferior amount of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a little bit larger screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px. Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a greater memory capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for low-light images and videos, it also counts with a way better video resolution, a much bigger camera sensor taking lot better quality photos and a camera with much more mega-pixels.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a bit superior battery life than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 16% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.