Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2023-05-09 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.34 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.38 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 SM7475-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 725 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a bit better than Xiaomi Poco F5, having a global score of 81 against 78.2. These devices have Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has the previous 11 version and Xiaomi Poco F5 has Android 13 version. Even being the best in this review, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro design is incredibly older, way thicker and somewhat heavier than the Xiaomi Poco F5.
Xiaomi Poco F5 features a little bit better screen than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a just a little worse screen density, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bit larger screen. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a way better processing power than Xiaomi Poco F5, although it has lesser RAM, they both have 8 cores.
The Xiaomi Poco F5 counts with a greater storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Poco F5 has better battery performance than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4050mAh.
The Xiaomi Poco F5's camera is very similar to the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro one, because although the Xiaomi Poco F5 has a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a back camera with a much higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.