Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2023-05-09 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.41 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Black | Black and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 524 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1400 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 2 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover Pro is a little bit better than the Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, getting a overall score of 81 against 79.5. Both phones in this comparison use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy XCover Pro has 11 version while Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro has Android 13 version. Despite being the best in our current comparison, Galaxy XCover Pro is an extremely older, somewhat thicker and just a little bit heavier phone than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro.
The Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro has a much better screen than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a quite bigger screen, a greater screen density and a better resolution of 1440 x 3200px. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a much greater processing power than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores.
Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro has a quite bigger memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory. Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro counts with improved battery life than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity.
The Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro's camera is very similar to the camera in Galaxy XCover Pro, because although the Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low light captures, it also counts with a camera in the back with a lot better 64 megapixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.