Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 78.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2020-07-14 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black | Green and Greener, Out of the Blue and Two Shades of Black |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover Pro is slightly better than the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, having a global score of 81 against 78.7. The Galaxy XCover Pro is a somewhat thicker and just a bit heavier device than the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro. Both phones in our current comparison use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy XCover Pro has a more recent 11 version and Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has Android 10 version, so it gives lots of additional features and performance optimizations.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a little bit better screen than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch of display. The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has a processor that's just as good as Galaxy XCover Pro's CPU, both have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount.
Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro counts with as much storage capacity to store more apps and games as the Galaxy XCover Pro, both have the same internal memory and an external memory card slot that holds up to 512 GB. The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro features longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 23% more battery capacity.
Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro captures much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for taking photos or video in low light environments, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a back facing camera with a much better 48 megapixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.